Other Recent Articles

post thumbnail

Career and Calling

“Fill the earth and subdue it.” — Genesis 1

Almost everyone must work in our world in order to make a living. This is something God has set up; as the Apostle said, “He who will not work shall not eat.” Thus working and having a job are moral issues; our willingness to work is a part of our character.

But beyond a job there are two other options within a civilized society: career and calling. These are higher moral possibilities for a human being, beyond mere work.

First we should be clear about some basic aspects of career or calling. The goal of a career is not to make a name for oneself or to become well-off financially. Neither is that of a calling. Often times a successful career or calling brings renown and wealth, but this is a lesser thing than the actual career or calling itself, and is relatively incidental. One cannot have an effective career or calling if one's goal is merely to make a name for oneself or to make money; it is a law of the mind and spirit. This is of course more emphatically true of a calling than of a career.

A career is a chosen path of work that requires the development of ones mind over a lengthy period of time. It is an attempt to do something good that requires effort over many years, and the realization of one's intellectual and perhaps physical capacities. Examples of careers are: running one's own business, practicing medicine or law, and training as a professional athlete. The career develops who we are in a way that a mere job cannot.

Accordingly success in a career is a matter of accomplishing the good which one had set out to do, in a manner which is itself good and right. Dishonesty or laziness in one's career brings failure in the sense that it prevents us from the realization of the personal qualities that make a career precious. Another kind of failure is when, because of circumstances or the decisions of others, we are prevented from accomplishing the good which we had intended. This kind of failure is of course not one's own fault.

A calling is something different, something beyond career in the way that career is beyond a job. Calling is a path of self sacrifice merely for the service of others and the full realization of ones moral and intellectual capacities. Some of the main callings are religious ministry, political service, artistic expression, and intellectual discovery, as in a university.

It is not wrong merely to have a job. There is dignity in all work; and there are other important aspects of doing good that are somewhat outside either career or calling: such as raising a family or submitting to the instruction of those who are in authority in some way.

One of the key things about both a career and a calling is that they must be consciously chosen as long term goals, usually when one is rather young, say before the late 30's.

I have written this post mostly for the sake of believers, because the church does not currently give helpful advice on this matter. Often career is taken to mean something that one does for oneself apart from God; whereas calling is simply identified with being a pastor.

Instead, career and calling, because they are long term goals, are an effective way to bring one's soul in contact with God, because to properly execute a successful career often requires God's help, especially in our current world. The same is even truer of a calling: in a calling one is pouring oneself out for others; this is a very basic way of discovering the Life of God.

Often one can only have a career or calling if one has been given certain opportunities. In reality, everyone who wants this should be given the opportunity. In this world that is often not so.

It is with reference to career and calling that one can see more clearly the nature of good and evil. In general, evil things can deflect us from a successful career or paralyze us while executing our calling. Love of pleasure of course withdraws the soul from the goodness of the work to be done; avarice prevents us from honestly and wholeheartedly pursuing it (especially by making us distrust God); desire for fame or respectability traps us in hypocrisy. One can read the works of the great moral philosophers and theologians as means to effect a great career or calling. Perhaps the ancient Stoics were the best at this.

When one understands the nature of career and calling, one can see the place that ambition appropriately holds in human life. We are meant to have our lives count-- as much as we will decide to pursue it. The good of society and the world itself depends upon people pursuing ambitious careers and callings. The destruction of a nation comes in part from a lack of people attempting to take such a high path. The same is true of people pursuing “careers” and “callings” merely for themselves or their desires. Instead, we should plan to realize our capacities in a way that is helpful for others, working it all out with God in the process.

January 15th, 2008 | Nathan | 0 comments | Continued
post thumbnail

Fasting

“To love fasting…” –The Rule of St. Benedict

One of the core disciplines for life in the Spirit is fasting. Solitude, silence, prayer, study, and scripture memorization/meditation are central of course to any program of Christian growth, but today what is less understood is the place that fasting has in the life of the believer. While not an authority on such matters (I will defer to Willard and Foster), it may be helpful to some if I describe what I do know about practicing fasting.

Like all the disciplines, there is more than one reason to pursue fasting. I would argue that there are key reasons that a Christian in particular should fast, but I should mention the general effects on the mind, soul, and body which will be experienced by anyone who attempts to make this a part of his or her life. Undoubtedly there are more reasons than I am mentioning here.

For anyone, fasting increases the sensitivity of the mind– both in thought and in feeling. One is more sensitive during the fast, but increasingly so at all times after one has made fasting a habit. Extended fasting (e.g. three days) can in fact make it possible for the basic ideas of the mind to be altered, for better or for worse. Thus we want to be in the presence of good ideas and images when we first attempt such a lengthy task. Because of these effects on the mind, fasting was a part of most Greek and Roman educational plans in the ancient world, as well as in the Christian Philosophy of the first few centuries A.D. The Hebrew prophets and Christian saints fasted in part because it can actually open the mind to visions of things beyond our normal experience.

The body too receives good things from a fast. Although, as everyone knows, when one first goes without food one feels miserable and weak, those experienced in fasting actually find a certain strength, as the soul begins to recover and fill the body. Apparently those who are advanced in the practice of fasting feel a special rejuvenation through it.

The soul of man is not in full health when one first starts to practice spiritual/ philosophical disciplines. But as we fast (and do other things) the soul begins to be purified from some of the corruption that inhabits it. This leads to an improvement in our overall quality of life.

The spirit too gains strength and determination as it acts upon the body without the energy that comes through food.

Because of these general effects of fasting on the soul, body, mind, and spirit, fasting is found in virtually every religion: from Buddhism, Taoism, and Hinduism, to Native American religion, and the more familiar Christianity, Judaism, and Islam. Ancient religion, including classical paganism and classical Philosophy, heavily incorporated fasting in their programs for delivering the mind from ignorance and purifying the soul from the structures of evil that inhabit it under normal conditions.

The Christian of course has greater resources than these general ones when he or she fasts. To those who believe, Christ and His Spirit begin to fill the body and bring to the surface the evil in our wills. This is not always pleasant, but usually the lasting effects are well worth the effort. The Word of God, both as Christ and the Scriptures, has a spiritual energy and order to it. When one uses fasting in conjunction with study and meditation on the Scriptures one finds strength that one never knew was there. The way that fasting opens up the mind makes meditation a more profitable experience for several days after the fast.

The second benefit that a Christian receives from fasting is in conjunction with work and service: spiritual power. As Jesus said “My food is to do the will of Him who sent me.” This power is primarily a matter of God’s Spirit upholding our soul, spirit, and body, but also to some extent and after some experience the Spirit proceeds out from us to those whom we serve or with whom we live.

How does one practice it? Unless one’s soul is in some state of emergency it is best to learn how to do it slowly. Choose one day a week and only have fruits and vegetables. After several weeks try skipping a meal once a week; and several weeks after that skip two. When one is fasting a full day regularly (once, twice or three times a week) one can in general experience many of the things that have been described in this post. We should be sensitive to God’s speaking to our souls and minds at this time. When one is a beginner one should be gentle, and not try to be a hero. For the first few times fast on Saturday, and get plenty of rest before, during and after. This will maximize the positive effects on the body and soul.

Some people seem to be called to extended fasts; Moses, Elijah, Jesus, and men like St. Francis went 40 days without food on some occasions. But fasting is very powerful, and one would usually be severely injured if one tried to do it for that amount of time. Unless God speaks clearly to us, we probably should limit it to a maximum of three days, and usually only one day at a time. Methodist ministers in the 18th and 19th centuries were required to fast twice a week, separating the two days with a day or two of eating.

I do not claim to have had all the experiences I have mentioned; much of what I have said comes from observing and listening to others, and from reading. But hopefully it can encourage some to be experimental with the practice, and to find more of God’s life through it.

January 10th, 2008 | Nathan | 2 comments | Continued
post thumbnail

Immortality and Incorruption

“For this corruptible must put on incorruption; and this mortal must put on immortality.”

“But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.”

–The Apostle Paul

We have discussed on several occasions the continuity between this life an the next. The biblical and philosophical traditions emphasize that we take with us our understanding, character, and relationships into our future in the universe, beyond our own physical death. This fact is essential to convince us of the importance of the kind of person we become in our short life on earth, and the meaningfulness of our earthly experience.

But there is also a profound discontinuity between our experience here and hereafter, and I believe it is this discontinuity that makes it difficult to speak with much assurance of the world to come. This difference could be described as the difference between mortality and immortality or corruption and incorruption. I would like to draw out some of the implications of these distinctions.

On the most fundamental level, mortality refers to the fact that all (a few biblical exceptions notwithstanding) human beings die. Corruptibility refers to physical and biological entropy, that is, the inevitable process by which the life cycle of an organism comes to a close by breaking down. This corruptibility is shared by us with plants, animals, and the physical conditions of the universe. Sequoia trees, some of the longest living organisms on earth, eventually reach the end of their life span and die. Stars decay over billions of years, and planets slowly become uninhabitable. Human beings themselves enjoy a short youth, and soon reach a maturity that comes at the price of the breakdown of the body.

These are not merely physical facts, but in fact have spiritual significance.

Much of conscious human experience is determined by mortality and corruption. Each day comes to a close, followed by night. We grow tired, and must sleep. We grow hungry, and must eat. The earth and its inhabitants experience four seasons every year; with plant and animal death following life, and life following death. Several of the great Psalms focus on this mortality in nature.

Thus the environment in which we live is defined by mortality and corruption; but so are our bodies and even perhaps our souls. Our senses are most powerful as a child and youth; slowly they begin to lose their clarity. Romantic love especially goes through phases: first the infatuation of childhood, then the blossoming of young love, and finally the mature love of older men and women. Families are defined by the various stages of corruption and mortality in human life– grandparents, parents, and children receiving their places in life in a measured, temporary way. Civilizations are born, prosper, and come to an end. The body itself loses its natural powers in the evening of life, finally succumbing to death in one way or another.

There is something deeply meaningful here, and yet also perhaps something morose. It can be comforting and depressing at the same time. The life cycles of the created universe are beautiful; but in the face of human aspirations much experience of those cycles is humanly tragic. A young person may die in a car crash, for example.

What we want to consider is what the promises of immortality and incorruption have to offer us. Imagine a world in which no one ever dies. War, famine, murder, and suicide have no place there. The human body is constantly refreshed and continually in a healthy state. Relationships continue indefinitely, and over time we know more and more other people. A life’s work does not come to an end, but rather develops into something greater time and time again. Government no longer maintains itself by threat of death. These are some of the basic properties of the world to come; and when one thinks about it one can see how vastly different human experience will be.

Perhaps one can see this best by considering art in such a world: high art as well as popular art. Art as we know it on earth is very much wrapped up in the earthly human experience. Romantic love and marriage, family, death, history, war, and the rectification of evil are some of its most important subject matter. But in the age to come we will die no more, marry no more, and human history as we know it will come to an end. What then will be the subject of art? I think that there must be some kind of beauty beyond current human experience, which will be the subject of art for the age to come.

Our interests and the condition of life will one day be totality determined by eternal factors; and as Romans 8 suggests, humanity in its immortality will bring God’s incorruption to bear upon the rest of the cosmos.

Thus it is our destiny to enter into eternity, and to stay there permanently. One could think of this as a person trapped in a small room opening the door to a vast landscape such as the Grand Canyon. In this field of divine and human activity the limitations which we assume in our current state will be removed. As was said in the Middle Ages, “the creation in time is a revelation of the eternal acting of God.” May we all find ourselves well prepared for such a future.

January 8th, 2008 | Nathan | 0 comments | Continued

post thumbnail

Qualities and Relations

No discussion of sexuality could be complete without considering marriage, abortion, homosexuality, and the nature of the masculine and feminine. I will try to examine at least a few of these. However, there are certain relevant facts needed before one can make progress in this direction. All of these issues are politically charged, and so we must be careful what we say, but some things are relatively certain.

Currently the liberal/conservative battle over human nature rages on because neither side is thinking very deeply. While the Right argues from Biblical authority and cultural tradition, the Left swallows wholesale the assumptions of Modernity and then develops its opinions reasoning from the ideas of individualism, freedom, and empiricism. Neither approach will work. Biblical and cultural authority is only helpful if one understands the statements by the authority. Currently the Right does not understand the nature of the human being (in fact, it has a similar view as the Left), although they are technically correct in what they propound in terms of laws and policies.

The Left is in a similar situation. Their authorities are the great 20th century intellectuals. However, these authorities base most of their thought on the premise of materialism, and, as we shall see, materialism does not allow a comprehensive version of the human self. I would not claim to be an expert on such matters myself, but what I think I know I will try to explain.

To try to demonstrate the importance of the metaphysics we will discuss, I will first lay out what can be known about the person by a strictly materialist account. First, we can know that human beings are physical animals. Second, a human being’s body will die after one hundred years or so. Third, desires and feelings make up a large part of the choices that human beings make. Fourth, one of the major purposes of human life is to mate and raise children. Fifth, the conscious life of a human being is heavily dependent upon the brain. Sixth, the body (and brain specifically) can be developed through training. Seventh, we have experience of the world through the five senses.

There is a little more to it, specifically in considering the physical properties of man and woman, the brain, and mammals in general, but this is a rough outline of what one can know by a physicalist perspective. I also think that these are rather certain facts. Nevertheless, unfortunately, much of the information we need to make specific choices cannot be gleaned from these physical descriptions of the human being.

The main limitation to the physical point of view is in its very nature. It makes no statements about non-physical reality, which is in fact the environment in which we live, move and have our being. It is also a part of our very nature to be a spiritual being; which certainly at least means non-physical. A very brief description of nonphysical reality can do a lot to help us understand human nature.

Loosely speaking, all things, physical or not are composed of properties and matter. These properties can be qualities or relations. We need knowledge of the qualities and relations of the physical world in order to deal with that world. In fact, physical qualities are often more important than physical relations. In the morning, I can compare the colors of two socks in order to make sure I am wearing a matching pair. You could ask me to hand you the piece of paper on a particular shelf and I would understand you. Unfortunately, today that is usually about as far as we go. If there are only physical qualities and relations, then one cannot make sense of the need for marriage to be life long (and not merely to cease after mating and raising children), nor is it clear why abortion is undesirable. After all, whatever else one may say, a fetus is not a fully developed human being, and it is a particular part of a woman’s body. Not much can be said about homosexuality and gender “roles” as well, apart from perhaps what one observes among the rest of the animal kingdom. As we have already noted, if the physical that is all that exists, there is no permanent future in the universe for each individual human being.

But this is not all that can be known. From our own daily lives we can know that there is a part of us that cannot be described by science: our conscious experience itself. There is a lot to say here of course, but I will pass over it in the interest of this particular essay.

This nonphysical dimension of the person has traditionally been called the soul. Nearly all religion, and most art and literature before the twentieth century is based upon this supposition. Carved in stone at my undergraduate institution was “O stream of life, run ye slow or fast, all streams reach the sea at last.” The soul itself can be thought as a river flowing through time. It is in fact closely related to the body, and so people have been led to call it the “form” of the body, or perhaps its “principle of life.” Death is the separation of the soul from the body.

Without going into too many of the details, the soul survives physical death and then is maintained by God for a period until it is again deposited in a body. This is a matter of special revelation, but many of the profound humanist thinkers have come to the same conclusion.

The soul then has qualities and relations that are rooted in its substance and which make it what it is. In contrast with the physical case, the relations of the soul are actually much more important than the soul’s qualities. We will have a lot to say about this in later posts regarding the sexual/gendered dimension of the self. What must be said is that these relations are as real and as strong as ‘redness’ in a sweater or heat in a cup of warm coffee. These relations do in fact determine most if not all of our lives. (Of course, free choice is a certain kind of relation.)

In our cultural climate, one needs to have these relations of the soul clearly before one’s mind if one does not want to lapse into the way of the world. As we have already remarked, the nature of God, law, love itself, and the many gender issues that we will be discussing cannot be understood without the notion of real relations in and around the soul. It may in fact turn out that qualities and relations are very much the same in an essential way, and thus they are often both termed ‘properties.’ In the next essays, I will attempt to apply these metaphysical notions to the complicated political issues I have mentioned.

November 26th, 2007 | Nathan | 1 comment | Continued
post thumbnail

Where We Stand

Although it is helpful to have a comprehensive vision of education, equally important is an understanding of where we actually stand as a society with regard to education. The prominence of our institutions of higher learning may deceive us into thinking that people are being adequately educated every day. Rather, the opposite is true. Seeing what is going on today can be a great assistance to pursuing our own learning.

Our situation is one of distraction, ignorance, and hostility to truth.

The student at a university today is overwhelmed with activities and social engagements that put their academic life into turmoil. One especially sees this in my field, mathematics. It requires self-discipline to learn math, as is true of the rest of the sciences. Most students have neither the time nor the strength to do it well, and so although people they pass through the classes, they gain very little authentic, helpful knowledge. The many student organizations vying for the students’ time, and the culture surrounding partying and romantic involvements render time for homework non-existent, and can even make class attendance difficult.

Now, there are students who are able to spend enough time on their work (athletes and international students in particular often are better at this). These gain something by their time at the university, especially if they are in the scientific or technical fields.

The second fact of our situation is ignorance. In the humanities, one cannot avoid questions about God and the human soul. Nevertheless, a faculty member who has much knowledge of either is one in 10,000 or more. For various reasons, the information about the human self and ultimate reality is no longer under the professors’ command, nor is it something that they even think that they should know.

This leads us to the third property of the university today: hostility to truth. Not only are the faculty mostly ignorant of basic aspects of life, they are indignant that anyone would claim to know about such things. They thus, in general, try to discourage their students from seeking knowledge about the ultimate conditions of human life. Instead, they encourage very specific knowledge of theories, and the writings of the 20th century “authorities’. Often this takes the form of being interested in very specialized topics rather than about the nature of God or the soul. There is a tacit scorn for those who are genuinely interested in the knowledge of such things.

Now this is certainly not true of all professors in the humanities. But it is true of enough of them that one meets actual resistance in one’s quest to know, rather than finding a faculty being devoted to cultivating such a desire.

Now this is all a matter of our history. What happened in the twentieth century brought education to its knees and changed it from the wonderful thing that it had been to the abysmal thing it now is. There were several events of importance. The first took place in the early twentieth century when science became, for the intellectuals, the only arbiter of truth. There was a struggle for this to happen but it was mostly completed by 1950. Although there were still many learned people in the humanities, they were no longer in control of the destiny of the university. Philosophy, Literature, History and so forth no longer could claim to be avenues of knowledge about the human self and about God.

The second big event was the student revolutions of the 60’s. This was when the students, after the direction of the leaders of pop culture, threw of the old education and demanded something “better.” In the interest of racial and gender equality, and unrestricted student freedom, the students rejected traditional learning. These are, of course, significant things to be sure, but they are not the subject of a worthwhile education.

The faculty, because of their dedication to science, was unable to form a cohesive response to the students and so much of the traditional curriculum was discarded, and, within a generation, the students who were now “smarter” were the ones who had control of the academic disciplines. One cannot underestimate the amount of knowledge that was lost during this period—knowledge that had been faithfully passed down for centuries.

Today we find ourselves in a place where if someone wants to understand ultimate reality, in general the last place he or she should look is the university. There are shining exceptions to be sure—mostly in the form of a few individual faculty members here and there, who received their education before the mid 60’s. After rejecting its charter to educate, the university now functions as a place to help students get a good job, and to make them tolerant of others. This is important of course, but it does not have very much to do with being an educated person.

One more thing to discuss is the universities and colleges created in response to this crisis. Here I mean some of the upstart colleges created with the help of groups such as the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, and the various Christian and Catholic colleges, such as Seattle University, Biola, Westmont and Wheaton. Personally, I think that these are the best places to go to college right now. However, none of them (at least that I am aware) has set out to make its goal imparting knowledge of actual ultimate reality. The students read the Classics perhaps; and there is some exposure to beauty, and the truth of the sciences. The student culture is also vastly superior at these institutions, and the general character of the faculty may be better as well. The deficiency of knowledge, however, about the things most important in human life, is still present, just like at the secular institutions. The faculty has not been properly educated—so how can they educate others?

Therefore, it is not merely a matter of adequate education being too high an ideal to be realistically attained. There have been many times and places in which it has been done well. However, our time in America is not one of them. Because the human need for knowledge is so great, all of us, and especially those who aspire to be leaders, must do what we can to further our own learning, and this will usually mean doing things apart from university curriculum.

October 31st, 2007 | Nathan | 0 comments | Continued
post thumbnail

Adequate Education


Receiving or obtaining an adequate education is something that takes time. It cannot be done in a year or two– there is too much to learn. And if we do not have people teaching us who know what they are doing, our education is likely to be full of gaps.

Education can be divided into three areas: knowledge of the spiritual, knowledge of the personal, and knowledge of the physical. These are the three areas we most need knowledge about, in order of importance. They in fact overlap quite a bit, and so my descriptions of them each will at first be rather general.

Knowledge of the spiritual first and foremost refers to knowledge of God and the human soul, but it also includes some lesser– though essential– topics such as mathematics, logic, and metaphysics, epistemology, and music. “High Art” also usually falls into this category, since beauty is one of the great spiritual universals.

Knowledge of the personal means knowledge of who we are. We must come to understand the structures of human life, and specifically the structure of our own lives. This is where the humanities, as they are sometimes called, fit into the picture. The arts, literature, history, and moral and political philosophy all are focused on this. In the midst of this, sizable time must be spent reflecting on one’s family (and family history), one’s upbringing, and one’s goals for life. Writing and public speaking form the active part of the knowledge of the personal.

Knowledge of the physical refers to natural science primarily. While this is not as important as the other two, it is still essential. We are physical beings who live in a physical world, in a vast physical universe. We must understand and love the heavens, the world of plants and animals, the world of machinery and technology, and the physical conditions of our own existence. This is covered by astronomy, physics, biology, chemistry, geology, and geography. Less important are psychology, sociology, and economics, though these can be integrated into knowledge of the personal and knowledge of the spiritual as well: the nature of our soul is closely related to the nature of our body and brain; and there are material aspects to our social and political existence.

At the base of all these, happening in the background as it were, and supporting them, is our physical education. This requires playing games and sports, training our muscles systematically, and asceticism: such as fasting, vigil, solitude, and rest. The traditional disciplines associated with track and field have done this well on an institutional level.

Of course there are also very basic aspects to education. We must first learn to read, write, add, and be social before a more rigorous stint of education can be profitable.

 

But after we have mastered these, education in the higher sense can be commenced. The age at which we begin should depend upon our ability and our interest, and the whole thing, if done well, could be accomplished in perhaps 15 years.

I intend to go deeper into detail in some subsequent posts, but one thing that I should emphasize (in our contemporary culture) is that in each of these we are seeking knowledge of reality as it actually is (redundant as that may seem). We are not interested in theories or opinions, but in things in themselves: knowledge of God for instance, rather than merely knowledge of what some people have said of Him. And this includes the sciences too: knowledge of the chemical makeup of physical reality and not merely general notions derived from the history of chemistry. We must let the goal of knowledge be the core focus of our efforts. Then, and usually only then, will we find what we need from the various disciplines.

I should also repeat that I do not think that it is necessary for everyone to be educated in this way. This is merely an account of what it means to be an well-educated person. It is possible to be a good person and yet rather uneducated. If one had “to choose,” between being good and merely being “educated,” one should choose to be good. But in fact it is true of course that education, when done well, is the greatest aid to personal virtue (next to the Spirit of God). This comes back to what I said in the last post, that knowledge forms the basis of good choices. If all of our politicians, priests and pastors, and artists were educated, or only most of them, that would be enough for us to to enjoy a healthy corporate existence. In fact, the necessary knowledge would be disseminated throughout society.

Where we actually stand today will be the subject of the next post.

October 24th, 2007 | Nathan | 0 comments | Continued

post thumbnail

Knowledge and Choice


In our lives we are constantly faced with choices. These choices may be rather trivial: where to eat lunch, for example. Or they may be serious: how to raise a child. They may regard things in the short term: which gym should I join? Or long term: how should I plan for retirement?

In many ways, our lives are a series of choices. This is part of what it means to be a human being equipped with a free will. As we all know, many of these choices will shape the kind of person that we become; and for most of our choices, our lives and the lives of those around us will be significantly affected by what we choose to say or do.

We have already discussed how it is that we need to make good choices in the most important areas of our lives. But we must further look at the nature of choice to see how it relates to education.

For human beings, freedom of will is both a great opportunity and a terrible burden. We are responsible for vast things, even our whole lives. And those in leadership have an even heavier burden. They must direct the choices of others—and be responsible for the outcome.

Part of the problem of choice that we find in our daily lives is that there are many people and things that actively attempt to influence or even determine our choices. These may be people in authority, like a boss or a president, or they may be people devoted to getting us to give them something, as is the case with advertising and political/ religious propaganda. In addition to this there are our beliefs, our close relationships, our feelings and desires and even parts of our deepest soul that try to bring power to bear upon our decisions.

Though many of these choices are made rather spontaneously, we are fundamentally responsible for what we do or don’t do. And we will be held responsible: we will become a certain kind of person through our choices and have to live with the consequences of being that kind of person—in joy or in misery.

The only adequate answer to the human quandary is knowledge. I don’t especially enjoy pointing this out, because most of us do not have the knowledge that we need. We need to know how things are, what will happen in the future, and what the consequences of particular choices will be. If we do not know, we will only be able to act based upon authority, opinion, feeling, or worse. And of course each of these might be helpful: we may know good authorities, have solid opinions, and possess healthy feelings. But in fact, in order for this to work effectively, our authority must really know what he or she is talking about; our opinions must be based upon fact; and our feelings must be in harmony with reality.

For many of us, left without knowledge of the most basic aspects of life, we will find ourselves drifting through the days and years of our lives until we begin to reap the consequences of our choices. Without knowledge to stabilize us in our flight of human life, we will be destined to a turbulent existence—perhaps forever. When it all comes down on our heads we will feel like a victim—though in reality we are experiencing self-imposed results.

And so each of us—no matter what place in society—need to have knowledge. And that means knowledge about everything that happens in human life; as well as knowledge about ultimate reality.

This is what education is for. We need to know. And not just about trivial things. We need to know the meaning of human life, our own capacities, human capacities in general, God, human nature, history and our place in it. We need to know what is good, what is evil, what is beautiful, what is ugly, and what it means for something to be true or false.

Thus education is not a trivial matter— indeed it is one of the most important parts of human life. If education is generally understood in the sense of receiving knowledge—there is nothing more important in our lives.

To know something is to have a solid, sound, representation of it in our mind which corresponds to the reality. We all know many things, especially in the modern world. For example, we know that the world is round, who our parents or close family members are, who is president, and many things having to do with our jobs. One cannot be a competent human being today without it.

But there are many things we do not know and even do not know we do not know. The average person without an adequate education can be characterized as having all the ideas of his or her surrounding culture and unable to form a thought without them– and perhaps unable to distinguish his or her ideas from reality. This is the state most people live in today, even those (especially those?) who have studied in a college or university.

For all these reasons we each have much invested in how education and learning are done in our society.

This is not to say that everyone needs to have an extended period of higher education. If one can stand it, one should take it; but if not one must rely on those who do know the way the world works.

The natural questions that follow are: What is an adequate education? And is what we receive today adequate?

October 24th, 2007 | Nathan | 0 comments | Continued
post thumbnail

Ultimate Images

“Thou shalt not make any graven image.” Deuteronomy 5

Just as the mind has ideas which it associates with ultimate reality, it also has images that implement these ideas in our actual lives. If we want to worship and serve God, which requires an accurate picture of the world in our mind, we must look then at the images which rule us and subvert those that are evil and false. When accurate images regarding what is most fundamental rule our minds, then our “whole body will be full of light.”

It is difficult to identify exactly what images move us, especially since we are likely to identify them with reality. Another difficulty is that images (just like ideas) are usually socially shared, and attempting to remove or change them, even in oneself, may appear threatening to others. Moreover, acting against one’s environment– even without opposition– can be difficult to manage psychologically.

But we cannot overemphasize the importance of having good and accurate ultimate images. Along with ideas (usually closely related to images) these are the area of life that evil spirits work hardest to influence. Of course God, Christ, and His angels are also at work to implement ideas and images that bring health and peace to the human soul. We can align ourselves with these persons by cooperating with their efforts in our lives.

In the ancient world, the paganism that made life so horrible was implemented almost entirely through physical images to which people literally would bow down. In the 20th century something similar happened among the Nazis and Communists. The swastika for the Germans and the images of Lenin and Stalin for the Russians evoked strong feelings in those who shared them, and allowed evil to have its way with millions of people.

This is why the second commandment, as quoted above, dealt with images. We may think that this is not applicable to us today since we do not live under an overt paganism. But what it is really dealing with are the images that occupy first place in our minds– the ones that have us in their power.

In contemporary America we are bombarded by images for many of our waking hours. They come to us in the clothing that we and others wear, the music and radio that we listen to, the T.V., Internet, and movies that we watch, the cars that we see on the road, the things we see at church, and so forth. Apart form creating mental turmoil and confusion, the net effect of this exposure is that powerful images to seep deeper and deeper into our souls and bodies.

Images of prosperity, sexuality, cultural authority, “science” and technology, and a few other things dominate the minds of most Americans. These images cause us to take things that are not central to life as though they were central. One of the clearest examples of this is automobile ads. These ads– sometimes simply a very large billboard by the freeway– present cars and trucks as one of the most important things in life. It goes far beyond the fact that we often (especially in Los Angeles!) need a car to get around in. If that were all there were to it, it would be fine. But prosperity, popularity, satisfaction, and even family intimacy, are associated with cars, and this can drive us continually seek a better one. It is then a major motive for earning money; and in many people it inspires a conscious goal. A sense of having “arrived” with the purchase of an expensive car, or the despair and frustration at not having one, do much to keep us from entering the kingdom of God by serving Him.

Each of the major images of modern life could be examined in this way, along with some commonly known–and misunderstood– historical examples. But I will instead focus on the positive aspect: the ultimate images of a healthy life in the kingdom of God.

God is a spirit, and so there is no way to have a direct visual perception of who He is in his spiritual nature. This is why the command against idols was given. (This doesn’t rule out God being directly perceived by the mind, of course.) But he has in fact revealed who He is in part through images: first angels, then through the tables of the Law and ark of the Covenant, the tabernacle and the temple, and the many images of the natural world presented to us in the Hebrew Scriptures.

Over and above this, however, is Christ Himself. The significant fact is that God Himself became an image. He did this so that we could confidently serve Him with our minds. Jesus said, “I am the Light of the world,” and “He who has seen me has seen the Father also.” The significance of Christ being the image of God is that we now can have an image in our mind that is humanly adequate to who God is.

This image must be formed through many choices. One must withdraw, to the greatest extent possible, from the images of our culture. Then one must take in the imagery about Christ found in the New Testament: especially in the Gospels and the book of Revelation. Beyond that, the icons and art of the Christian centuries can help us imagine who Christ is, and thus, who God is. In the end, however, it is good character that allows us to see Jesus. “Without holiness no man will see the Lord,” St. Paul said.

This is also part of the great importance of taking communion. It is an image which was created by Jesus Himself. Here the most fundamental physical source of life, food and drink, is used to mediate the presence of Christ, in flesh and blood, and the meaning of His death and Resurrection.

One of the greatest promises of the Bible is that “upright men will see His (God’s) face.” Near the end of the New Testament, John closes his sweeping view of humanity’s future with, “they shall see His face” (22:4). To the believer the final reward will be to see God as He is, and this will involve, in part, ultimate images.

October 18th, 2007 | Nathan | 0 comments | Continued
post thumbnail

The City of God


“The individual, when isolated, is not self-sufficing; and therefore he is like a part in relation to the whole.”

“Man is by nature a political animal” –Aristotle, Politics

When we look at the art of the Early Church, one of the most striking things is its depiction of Heaven. Though there are not so many pictures of the physical layout, there are many that emphasize the spiritual terrain. This landscape is the community of the Blessed. The gold background that is so typical of the art up to the middle ages is a way of expressing the Presence of God tangibly filling the air around those who live beyond death, in the next world. Often in a prominent place in this splendid background is an image of Christ which imparts a sense of his current glory, and his leadership over the future world. There are, however, usually many pictures of angels, saints, prophets, and dead or resurrected Christians.

This is meant to be a picture of our future in the universe.

The present kingdom of heaven is life under the authority of God and His workers in the universe. To those with living confidence in God, training is being given in the Way of His Son, to prepare us for our work in the ages to come. This happens right in the midst of our daily lives on earth. As has been said earlier, we thus each have a glorious future of work and creativity in the universe.

But we also have a wonderful destiny together. This reality was called by Augustine “The City of God;” Aquinas referred to it as the perfection of the universe. There is something very deep here and it is related to the fundamental nature of God, angels, and human beings.

The social aspect of the person is the key here. It seems that persons are the kind of beings that find their fulfillment in giving and receiving love and joy for someone beyond than themselves. This is part of the image of God in man and angels. God is a community of mutual love among three glorious persons; to be in the image of His Son means to participate in the same kind of community; indeed, in the community of the Trinity itself. Our happiness lies in knowing and being known by the City of Persons that is in fact ultimate to everything.

This is the main reason that God did not place every man and woman on a separate planet in order to train for his or her destiny in the universe. Rather, he placed us all together, so that we could learn to love each other, and to love Him through loving others. It also seems to be the reason that we do not see the angels around us. We need to find our bearings in Love for each other before we can face the persons of perfect love. The glorious community of persons who are each distinct and yet hold so much in common is the secret reality in which we live.

In a small corner of this beautiful city lies the earth, a place of strife and pervaded with evil, at least on the visible side of things. This is because the nations currently living on the earth are in ignorance of or even rebellion against the City of Peace. For reasons that are difficult to enumerate, at many times and places in human history– including contemporary America– the existence and nature of this personal community has been unknown or concealed.

But the reality is still there; and the ultimate perfection of the universe is a vast community of personal beings who love each other. This love is no trivial matter; it is the love that is described in the New Testament. While we will still have opportunities to grow in love in the next life, this is the direction we should be heading even now so that we can take the benefits of who we are and what we have learned to our life in eternity.

For those who attain to the heavenly kingdom or Eternal City of God, their lives will be integrated forever into a beautiful matrix of persons that is fully self-sufficient because of the God who is its chief inhabitant. “Then shall I know fully; even as I am fully known.”

October 16th, 2007 | Nathan | 0 comments | Continued
post thumbnail

The Believer and the Institutions

“What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?’ Jesus answered answered and said unto them, ‘this is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he has sent.” John 6

“Put forth your hand.” Exodus 3

 

God gives his servants power by working with their work. For Abraham Lincoln, for example, this was practicing law, but it has been many different for many different Christians. You can see it in the lives of people like Albert Schweitzer, St. Francis, Thomas Aquinas and many others, from the famous followers of Christ to the not so famous. For me it is for seeking knowledge; in particular, mathematical knowledge. God upheld Lincoln as a lawyer, and others in their respective occupations; and, I hope, he will uphold me as a mathematician, because I trust in Him.

He does not, however, work on our behalf so that we can serve institutions. Rather His desire is to put us directly under Him, and Christ, so that we are not rooted in universities, churches, or governments, but rather rule by His power and act on His behalf.

The person who follows Christ thus cannot have it as his goal to please institutions, because the requirements of pleasing the institutions conflict with the requirements for serving Christ. This is particularly true with how we spend our time. Rather, our goal must be to please Christ, and to act by His power. God works on behalf of His servants while they serve Him.

This is why Christ’s people are revolutionaries; they are beyond the reach of human institutions– and in fact will almost always come in conflict with them. This can mean being ostracized or even killed, but Christ will continue to be faithful to us in all situations.

Thus the only sane and safe way to approach life is to serve Christ and His people; to refrain from serving money, fame, pleasure, institutions, or powerful people. We will have to interact with these things, but it is not wise for us to use them as our ultimate point of reference. These finite things cannot sustain the life of our soul, and in fact they will only last for a short time.

Only God’s kingdom is forever. If we learn to live in it here on earth, our life will be glorious and eternal, uninterrupted by death, and we will learn how to treat all things appropriately, including institutions.

October 10th, 2007 | Nathan | 0 comments | Continued