Culture
“…Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable, if anything is excellent or praiseworthy– think about such things.” Philippians 4:8
In the last fifty years there has been a resurgence of interest in education among Christians. This is clearly a good thing; but we must be careful to remember that there is more to the life of the mind than merely what is received during one’s youth. And there is more than merely being a “lifelong learner.”
What I am referring to is culture, especially what is called “high culture.” I will not attempt a full definition of culture in this article (which would be a substantial task), but rather discuss it’s role in corporate and individual human life.
A cultured person is one who has a mind that has been “cultivated”– over many years– by what is good, and true and beautiful. A cultured individual moves easily in the realms of knowledge and art, and has a “taste” that has been developed through extended moral effort (i.e. “Learning to appreciate” things). The culture of a society consists of the mode of intellectual cultivation held in common by a substantial group of people.
Culture is “high” when the length of time required to participate in it is great, and when higher moral capacities must be invoked in order to receive it. Thus Baroque music is higher than the popular music of the 1940’s America, though both are examples of good culture.
There have been several high cultures in history– most great civilizations have had one (and indeed, culture is inseparable from civilization). The Babylonians, the Persians, the Hebrews, the Indians, the Chinese, the Japanese, the Greeks and Romans, are the best early examples of this. The last two millennia in the Western world has seen various forms of Christian culture, culminating (unfortunately) in the materialist culture of the early 20th century. In a limited way other civilizations could be included in the mix– perhaps the ancient Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas, as well as some of the Barbarian tribes of Northern Europe early in the Christian Era. These had some limited arts, astronomy, and perhaps some mathematics.
Next to the rare, ecstatic enjoyment of God, culture and the aesthetic instances of it are the sources of the deepest and highest pleasures available to human beings. They are deepest because they touch on our very hearts and souls, and highest because they lift our minds to a level of greatness that they do not otherwise reach.
Culture is not a “nice” but unnecessary part of human life. It is an important part of human happiness, individually and corporately which is based upon the spiritual and intellectual nature of a human being. It is a training ground for the moral capacities needed for national life, and one of the essential rewards of being a good person. It is also the public arena of good and evil.
The greatest ancient cultures were the Hebrew and classical Greek and Roman cultures. The Greeks and Romans attained an unprecedented level of civilization, with some of the deepest insights into goodness, truth, and beauty that exist. Under strictly human and angelic capacities, they did the best. The Hebrews in fact had a less extensive culture, but the principles upon which their culture was based were matters of supernatural revelation, and thus exercised more power over human life.
But it is the Christian culture which succeeded the classical world which was highest overall. Armed with the moral and spiritual insights of the Old and New Testaments, “classical” civilization was reinterpreted and expanded for many centuries. The great philosophy of the Middle Ages, the art of the Renaissance, and the political advancements of the 18th century are some of the greatest instances of this high culture.
Because culture is so important for our lives, it is one of the main things that God is interested in on the earth. It is also something that Jesus draws us into as we follow him. In itself it is intrinsically valuable, and part of what makes human beings so precious.
There are various ways of participating in culture. They are all good, but have different degrees of pleasure and effort associated with them. The first is simple exposure to culture: reading a dialog of Plato or going to a museum or musical performance for example. Next is reception and study of culture: learning to play a classical piece on the piano, studying art history, or learning physics or chemistry. This second step requires discipline and begins to work a substantial change on our minds and hearts. The third and greatest involvement is contribution: sculpting a man or woman under Renaissance principles, writing a piece for the piano, or (as interests me) developing new theorems and theories in mathematics.
We are now in a situation under which we can appreciate the role of the university in Modern society. It is the center of high culture. Those who train there and “research” there make their contribution to human culture itself, or perhaps to a more adequate understanding of it. Theology, philosophy, history, literature, art, science, mathematics– these are the disciplines under which goodness, truth, and beauty have come to the Western world. And perhaps there is no more effective way.
Because of what we have said about the order of cultural value, we can see that teaching in a cultural area is not as important or enjoyable as deeply penetrating a single discipline, and making a unique contribution to it. To recover a “Christian culture” young Christians with high ideals must go into the core fields, and learn from Jesus there how to take their stand for goodness, truth, and beauty.
But as has been said, this is not merely a service to the world, it is a source of great happiness, and an important means of preparing or own souls for eternity. Much of what is in our spirits is a matter of what we love and what we do not love. If Christians seriously pursue this they will, as in other ages, find the help of God and renew our actual Western culture, which deeply needs the life of God.


























Comment by Malea on 28 February 2008:
Dear Nathan,
i enjoyed your post immensely and have one question. It seemed to me that you were promoting becoming a certain sort of person who can broadly have well-ordered desires and loves and an ability to appreciate goodness, truth and beauty in many aspects of life. This seemed to me to require a well-roundedness and breadth of interests. Then, at the end, you mentioned that this leads to the importance of specializarion in a single discipline. Can you explain more fully why this follows if it does?
Comment by admin on 29 February 2008:
The hidden premises are the extreme finitude of the human mind, and the vastness of each field of learning. Like I said, there are different levels of engagement with culture. On the superficial (“broad”) level we want to be well read, have familiarity with art in general, and have a large range of interests. This is a matter of being exposed to culture, and it is a positive and important thing.
On the second level, what I call reception, an extended period of engagement with the subject matter is required. This involves some measure of specialization: there are some pieces for the piano that would take ten years to learn how to play, if one is starting from no familiarity with music. This probably corresponds to a B.A.,M.A./M.S., or even Ph.D. in say, literature. This would mean that you would have to read less about other things during this period if you wanted to succeed. The human life is usually between seven to nine decades long, and so on this level there are only so many possibilities. If I learn how to play the piano at a relatively high level; learn to sculpt; learn to read Latin, Greek, Hebrew, French, German, and Italian; become adept at painting; and spend some serious time with philosophy, theology, history, literature, physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics and so forth—that might eat up my whole life or more likely, even several lifetimes.
But we are still not done. One of the most cultured people that I have ever come across is a history teacher I had at ‘SC. He was near retirement, and had spent his entire life studying and teaching history, translating important documents, and visiting historical places—mostly in Eastern and Central Europe. This is a lifetime’s work—and it results in great blessing for others and develops one’s understanding in a way that nothing else can. It is also the level at which one finds the most happiness in a discipline. And the reason for this is simple: the mind and will experience the greatest contact with reality when they are intently focused on one particular thing, and full intensity requires many years of seeking. Einstein, for example, could not have done what he did if he had engaged in every discipline equally. His special insights into mathematics and physics required substantial time and interest.
There have been great men and women in history that have gone deeply into several disciplines, and even made a significant contribution to more than one. Blaise Pascal comes first to mind, but there are many others. No human being, however, is capable of going very deeply in everything, and this has to do with the shortness of life, the limited availability of knowledge, and the fact that we cannot think about more than two or three things at once. Beyond that there are also other factors, even the limited capacities of our bodies. Can the body really learn to play five instruments while speaking and reading seven languages and so forth? Accordingly, while it is good to know something about everything, there is also an important place for knowing a lot about something in particular.
This is not a bad thing; it is part of what makes distinct personality possible. When one spends time with one thing and is shaped by it, one develops into a special kind of person, with his or her own take on the world. I also should mention that I think there is culture in heaven, and that we will have the opportunity to go as deeply as we want into as many different disciplines as we want. But this will take a lot of time; and the order in which we study things, the kinds of talents we have as individuals, and the creativity and freedom our wills possess will cause us each to be very different from each other, in knowledge and many other ways. And presumably in the next life there will be exciting things other than what we now call “culture,” or that have much to do with culture at all, as we currently understand it.
I hope that helps. Let me know if I didn’t answer your question.